Maxxim ← Back to the 3D Process pack

A working document from the engine, opened for reading — the format every client receives.

Events Plan, Maxxim

Events Plan

How to read this plan

This is the Events Plan for Maxxim, produced in the Deploy phase against Master Briefing v2.1, the Gate 1 decisions of 27 June 2026, and the 1 July refresh that folded in the 29 June product mechanics and the live Jewell partner site. It turns Marketing Plan into an event programme, sitting on Discover Summary and Customer Profile. Unlike a conventional events plan, the centre of gravity here is not a calendar of conferences and trade shows. It is two strands the strategy demands.

The first strand is a single founding moment: the 3 July session, run as a partner discovery and alignment session, not a demo, whose output is a partner map. This is Campaign 1 of the marketing plan, the Founding Table. The second strand is the community operating rhythm itself, treated as a recurring event programme: a weekly open table, a monthly business review, a quarterly strategy and showcase, an annual offsite, and regional meetups. The community is not a side benefit of the events; in this model the community is the event programme, because the business plan and the brand strategy both name it as the human moat and a first-order growth engine, and the marketing plan makes it the strategic centre.

Two facts known since the 27 June version sharpen this plan. First, the real product mechanics from the 29 June guide give the founding session something concrete to show: three named specialists, each a process (Max does the words in Claude Cowork, Sal does the pixels in the Design Studio, Pip runs the Social Studio), a gated Discover to Design to Deploy to Deepen method, mechanical gating that unlocks creative only as its briefs exist, finished websites the client owns, and a read-only client portal with a private assistant called Ari. The live proof in the room is the engine running on a real business, not a slide about it. Second, the live Jewell partner is used as a proof exhibit for the session: a 35-year operator running the whole model in market, the first working evidence that the partner model holds. Jewell is shown as evidence and pattern; Jewell's own named results stay under Jewell's banner and are not re-used as Maxxim's own public proof.

The same discipline as every upstream document applies. Real pricing anchors are stated as real: the Growth Diagnostic at $4,950 credited forward, the premium engagement band of $25,000 to $250,000 with a recent run near $80,000, the specialist module near $1,500. Every budget figure, partner economic, and percentage here is illustrative, pending pilots, and must be confirmed by Clent before it is treated as locked or used externally. Proof respects clearance: Pottsville Acupuncture is the only cleared public example and the cleared external proof for the session; OTR Earthmover is internal only; Hidrive is percentages only. The exact session promise wording is OPEN and Clent's to finalise; this plan offers options and does not lock it. Ownership is Clent and Raef only; Paul Clancy is a Client Partner, not a co-founder. Australian English throughout, no em dashes, no exclamation marks.

1. Events Objectives

Five objectives, each tied to a specific marketing plan goal with a measurable target. The headline numbers mirror Marketing Plan and the business plan leading indicators; where a baseline is directional it requires Clent sign-off before it is treated as a commitment.

Objective 1: Open the partner community at the 3 July session

Objective 2: Prove the seven points of v2.1 Section 10 in the room

Objective 3: Convert the room into the founding cohort pipeline

Objective 4: Stand up the community rhythm as a retention and deal-flow engine

Objective 5: Make every event a content and proof factory

2. Event Strategy Overview

The strategy follows the model, not events convention. Maxxim is recruiting a small, high-trust founding cohort through demonstration and relationship, then keeping that cohort together as a compounding community. So the recommended event types are intimate, partner-facing, and rhythm-based, not broad, public, and spend-based. This matches the marketing plan's roughly 70 percent brand-and-community to 30 percent direct-response emphasis: the trust gap is closed by proof and a human, not by a click.

Event types recommended, and why

Event types explicitly NOT recommended now, and why

Strategic rationale in one line. Spend the event energy where the model actually moves: an intimate founding moment, then a sustained community rhythm. Demonstration and belonging, not reach and spectacle.

3. Event Calendar

The recommended calendar for the engagement period, prioritised by impact and feasibility. The founding session is the anchor; the recurring programme begins from it; the quarterly showcase and the annual offsite extend beyond the founding-cohort window. All budgets are illustrative, pending Clent sign-off, and are deliberately modest because the model is proof-led and partner-led.

Event Type Timing Target audience Primary objective Estimated budget (illustrative) Expected outcomes
The Founding Table (3 July session) Owned, anchor, one-off 3 July 2026 Operator Owen (license door) primary; Connector Carol (refer door) secondary; the named pipeline as the seed list Open the community; produce the partner map; prove the seven points Low. Venue or platform, materials, live Max, Sal, and Pip walkthrough prep. The cost is facilitation time, not media. Partner map; 8 to 12 qualified attendees; 6 plus weekly-table opt-ins; follow-ups booked; 5 plus content pieces
Weekly open table Owned, recurring, virtual (async option) Weekly from mid-July 2026 Signed and onboarding founding partners Compounding knowledge and trust; light, no sell Very low. Video platform and light facilitation time only. Participation baseline; shared learnings into the hub library; one client challenge solved per session
Monthly business review Owned, recurring, virtual Monthly from August 2026 Active partners Performance, deal matching, roadmap line into Max, Sal, and Pip Very low. Platform and prep time; doubles as the monthly reporting meeting. Pipeline visibility; deals matched; product roadmap input; Diagnostics sold tracked
Quarterly strategy and showcase Owned, recurring, hybrid Quarterly from Q4 2026 Active partners; invited prospective partners Case-study factory; set next vertical; review pilot economics Low to modest. Light production for the hybrid stream and case-study capture. One cleared case study per quarter; next vertical set; economics reviewed toward locked
Regional meetups Owned, recurring, in person, partner-led Between offsites, as partners cluster Local partner clusters Belonging and regional deal flow Low, partner hosted. Venue and refreshments only, often partner absorbed. Local relationships; regional referrals; retention
Annual offsite Owned, annual, in person Annually (first one beyond the founding window) The full partner community The family glue: vision, recognition, co-creating the next year Modest, the largest single event line, scaled to cohort size and confirmed by Clent. Retention; recognition; next-year plan co-created; strongest content and testimonial capture

Priority. The 3 July founding session is first and non-negotiable. The weekly table is second, because it is the cheapest, highest-frequency retention act and it keeps the founding energy alive. The monthly review and quarterly showcase follow. The annual offsite is the highest-cost event and is deliberately sequenced beyond the founding-cohort window so it lands when there is a cohort worth gathering and wins worth recognising.

4. Owned Event Plans

4.1 The Founding Table: the 3 July session

Concept and theme

This is the founding meeting of the partner community, framed as discovery and alignment, not a demo. The frame the room should feel: you are not being sold a tool, you are being invited to a table where trust, taste, and judgement are shared, and everyone is stronger for it. The proof in the room is the engine run live on a real business, the honest evidence that Max, Sal, and Pip do the machine 80 percent while the human signs the 20, supported by Pottsville Acupuncture as the cleared external proof and by the live Jewell partner as the working example of an operator already running the whole model. The exact promise wording is OPEN and Clent's to finalise; three framings are offered in Section 5 of this plan and below, none locked.

Format

Intimate, invitation only, in person preferred with a tight virtual option for distributed operators (so the founding session itself models the weekly table's async inclusivity). Roughly two to three hours, run as a facilitated session with structured participation, not a lecture. The seven points of v2.1 Section 10 are the spine of the run of show.

The run of show

The timeline below is the recommended shape. It deliberately spends the most time on the live proof and on the partner mapping, because the output is a partner map and the job is alignment, not presentation.

The 3 July run of show. Each block maps to one or more of the seven v2.1 Section 10 proof points (shown as P1 to P7). The live proof is the engine run on a real business; Pottsville is the cleared external proof; Jewell is the live partner exhibit. The output is a partner map.

   3 JULY SESSION -- RUN OF SHOW  (founding meeting, ~2.5 hrs)

   TIME   BLOCK                                          PROVES
   -----  ---------------------------------------------  ----------
   0:00   ARRIVE + WELCOME                               sets frame
          Name badges, warm welcome, the table is set.
          Frame: "a discovery + alignment session, not
          a demo." Promise stated [WORDING OPEN].
                                                         |
   0:15   THE CAP WE ALL FEEL  (open the problem)        P5
          Clent names the founder-capacity cap and the
          80/20 thesis. Operator-to-operator, no slides
          as hero. "Someone named the cap I feel daily."
                                                         |
   0:30   LIVE PROOF: THE ENGINE ON A REAL BUSINESS      P1,P2,P3,P4
          Live run of the 3D spine: Max writes the words
          in Cowork, Sal makes pixels in the Design
          Studio, Pip drafts social. Show the gates hold
          (creative unlocks only as its briefs exist);
          show the human SIGN the gate; show a phase NOT
          proceed until signed. Human visibly at wheel.
                                                         |
   1:05   CLEARED EXTERNAL PROOF: POTTSVILLE             P1,P5
          Pottsville Acupuncture: full 3D run, launched
          site the client OWNS outright (hosted, theirs).
          The only cleared public proof. (OTR internal
          only -- not shown. Hidrive percentages only --
          not shown.)
                                                         |
   1:20   THE LIVE PARTNER: JEWELL                       P6,P7
          Jewell shown as the working example: a 35-yr
          operator running the whole model live, owning
          the human 20% with Maxxim as the machine 80%.
          Evidence the partner model holds. (Jewell's
          named results stay under Jewell's banner.)
                                                         |
   1:35   THE PARTNER MODEL + THE TWO DOORS              P6
          Land + expand: Growth Diagnostic $4,950 ->
          3D engagement -> Deepen. Two doors: license
          to deliver / refer for a fee. Economics:
          STRUCTURE shown, NUMBERS not stated (OPEN).
                                                         |
   1:50   "HOW WOULD YOU USE THIS?"  (the discovery)     P7
          Round-table: each operator names a client or
          vertical they would run this on. This is the
          alignment work, and it builds the partner map
          in real time.
                                                         |
   2:10   BUILD THE PARTNER MAP  (the output)            output
          On a shared board: who is in the room, door
          preference (license / refer / specialist),
          vertical strength, who they could refer to.
          The partner map is produced ON THE DAY.
                                                         |
   2:25   THE INVITATION + NEXT STEP                     close
          Invite into the cadence (weekly table opt-in).
          Book the 1:1 follow-up. No hard close; the
          door is open, the table is set.
   2:30   CLOSE

Agenda

BlockWhat happensOwnerSection 10 point proved
Welcome and frameSet the table; state the promise (wording OPEN); make clear this is discovery and alignment, not a demoClentSets the frame for all seven
The cap we all feelName the founder-capacity cap and the 80/20 thesis, operator to operatorClentP5 (method improves commercial clarity)
Live proof: the engine on a real businessLive run of the 3D spine, Max on words in Cowork, Sal on pixels in the Design Studio, Pip on social; the gates hold and unlock creative only as briefs exist; the human signs the gate; a phase does not proceed until signedClent, with Raef on the platformP1, P2, P3, P4
Cleared external proofPottsville Acupuncture, launched and owned. OTR and Hidrive not shown (clearance)ClentP1, P5
The live partner: JewellJewell shown as the working example of an operator running the whole model live; evidence the partner model holds; Jewell's named results stay under Jewell's bannerClentP6, P7
The model and the two doorsLand and expand funnel; license and refer doors; economics structure shown, numbers OPENClentP6 (partner model makes economic sense)
How would you use thisRound table: each operator names a client or vertical they would run it onFacilitated, all attendeesP7 (audience sees how they would use it)
Build the partner mapCapture who is in the room, door preference, vertical strength, referral links, on a shared boardClent and RaefThe output
Invitation and next stepInvite into the weekly table; book the 1:1 follow-upClentClose into Objective 3

What to show

Venue and platform

A quiet, professional, intimate room that suits a facilitated round table, with reliable Wi-Fi and a screen for the live run of Max, Sal, and Pip, plus a clear connection for the virtual attendees. A simple shared digital board (visible to in-person and virtual attendees) hosts the partner map as it is built. Avoid a large auditorium; the room should feel like a table, not a stage.

Speaker and content needs

Clent leads as the founder and gate-holder; Raef supports on the platform for the live run. No outside speakers; the room is operator to operator. Content needs: the live Cowork and Studio environment ready to run the 3D spine; the Pottsville case ready to show; the Jewell partner exhibit ready to reference; a one-page partner-model summary with the two doors and the structure-only economics; the shared partner-map board template; name badges; a one-page leave-behind that invites into the cadence. The maxxim.ai site fixes (Section 6) must be live so attendees who check the site find a credible proof surface.

Promotion plan

See Section 6. In short: founder network and warm 1:1 invitation, an email invitation sequence to the named pipeline, and LinkedIn organic to profile the moment without making it a public open invite. The site fixes must be live before 3 July so attendees who check maxxim.ai find a credible proof surface (Jewell not "Joule", Paul Clancy as Client Partner, Pottsville added, two-door framing).

Registration approach

Invitation only, with a simple RSVP that captures name, organisation, role, the kind of clients they serve, and likely door interest (license, refer, specialist, undecided). This pre-seeds the partner map and lets the run of show be tuned to the room.

Expected attendance

8 to 12 qualified operators, seeded by the named pipeline (Alex and 3P with around 36 opportunities, Arran Aitken with a tradie database, Greg Johnson, Christy Kilmartin) plus warm founder referrals. Intimate by design; the goal is alignment and a partner map, not a full room.

4.2 The recurring community programme

The operating rhythm is itself an owned event programme. It begins at the founding session and runs continuously. The diagram shows the four cadences and how they nest. The brand discipline is light facilitation: the community must stay a flywheel, not a support burden, exactly as the business plan and marketing plan warn.

The community event rhythm. Four nested cadences, partner-led with light facilitation, beginning at the founding session. Each cadence has a single clear purpose so the rhythm stays light.

   THE COMMUNITY EVENT RHYTHM  (partner-led, light facilitation)

   WEEKLY  -- OPEN TABLE  (30-45 min, async option)
   +-------------------------------------------------------+
   | Wins | friction | ONE shared learning | ONE client    |
   | challenge put to the group. Light. No sell.           |
   | PURPOSE: compounding knowledge + trust                |
   +-------------------------------------------------------+
        | rolls up into
        v
   MONTHLY -- BUSINESS REVIEW
   +-------------------------------------------------------+
   | Pipeline + active engagements + what Max, Sal and Pip |
   | should improve. Doubles as the monthly reporting mtg. |
   | PURPOSE: performance, deal matching, roadmap line     |
   +-------------------------------------------------------+
        | rolls up into
        v
   QUARTERLY -- STRATEGY + SHOWCASE
   +-------------------------------------------------------+
   | A partner presents a CLIENT WIN -> case study factory.|
   | Set the next focus vertical. Review pilot economics   |
   | toward locking floor, clip, cap.                      |
   | PURPOSE: direction + proof + economics                |
   +-------------------------------------------------------+
        | rolls up into
        v
   ANNUAL -- OFFSITE  (in person, the family glue)
   +-------------------------------------------------------+
   | Vision | recognition | relationships | co-create the  |
   | next year. The relationship moment, together.         |
   | PURPOSE: belonging + retention + next-year plan       |
   +-------------------------------------------------------+

   OVERLAY -- REGIONAL MEETUPS  (between offsites, partner-hosted)
   small, local, in person -> local belonging + regional deal flow

   HOME BASE -- THE PARTNER HUB (online, extends the dashboard):
   method library | weekly-table channel | deal-share board |
   partner directory by specialty

5. Sponsorship and Speaking Strategy

Near term, Maxxim does not sponsor third-party events or chase external speaking slots, for the reasons in Section 2: the audience is a named, small set of operators reached through the founder network and the founding session, not a public hall. The proof-led, partner-led model does not need bought reach. This section therefore frames the selection criteria for when the position is ready, and treats the founding session and the quarterly showcase as Maxxim's own speaking platforms.

Selection criteria for any future sponsorship or speaking

Maxxim's own speaking platforms

Speaking topic proposals tied to the brand authority areas

The session promise: framed options, not locked

The exact promise wording is OPEN and Clent's to finalise. Three framings, offered as options, each true to the community direction and the locked external style (no em dashes, no exclamation marks). Clent chooses or rewrites.

Expected return from these owned platforms: the founding session returns a partner map and the cohort pipeline; the quarterly showcase returns cleared case studies and direction. Both are far higher return than any near-term paid sponsorship, because a single signed partner unlocks a delivery channel and recurring floor-plus-clip revenue (rates illustrative, pending pilots).

6. Event Promotion

Promotion is lean, warm, and proof-led, matching the marketing plan. The founding session is promoted by relationship, not by media. The recurring programme is promoted through the email community-rhythm stream and the partner hub.

Promotion timeline for the 3 July session

Channel strategy

Promotion of the recurring programme

Registration funnel and conversion assumptions

7. Attendee Experience

Every touchpoint is intentional, because for a grounded, credible brand the experience details shape perception. The journey below covers the 3 July session from invitation to follow-up, and applies, lightly, to the recurring programme. The brand register is warmer and more reciprocal here than on the website: this is the table, not a pitch.

The attendee journey and follow-up flow for the 3 July session. Each touchpoint carries the warm, reciprocal session register. The 48-hour follow-up is non-negotiable; after 72 hours momentum is lost.

   ATTENDEE JOURNEY + FOLLOW-UP FLOW  (3 July session)

   BEFORE
   [1] WARM INVITATION  (founder, 1:1)
        "A founding table. Discovery + alignment, not a demo."
            |
            v
   [2] RSVP  -> captures: org, role, client types, door interest
            |   (pre-seeds the partner map)
            v
   [3] CONFIRMATION + PRE-EVENT CONTEXT
        what to expect | how to join (in person / virtual) |
        a light prompt: "bring one client you'd run this on"
            |
            v
   ====================== ON THE DAY ======================
   [4] ARRIVE: name badge, warm welcome, the table is set
   [5] THE SESSION: cap -> live engine (Max/Sal/Pip) ->
        Pottsville -> Jewell as live partner -> model + two
        doors -> "how would you use this" ->
        BUILD THE PARTNER MAP -> invitation
   [6] IN-ROOM EXPERIENCE: operator-to-operator, round-table,
        every voice heard; structured participation, not a lecture
   =======================================================
            |
            v
   AFTER  (the conversion engine)
   [7] WITHIN 24 HRS: thank-you + the partner map shared back
        + the leave-behind (model summary, two doors, Pottsville)
            |
            v
   [8] WITHIN 48 HRS: 1:1 FOLLOW-UP BOOKED with every
        qualified attendee  <-- NON-NEGOTIABLE
        (after 72 hrs momentum is lost)
            |
            v
   [9] WEEK 1: door conversation (license / refer / specialist)
        + weekly-table opt-in confirmed -> into the partner hub
            |
            v
   [10] ONGOING: the community rhythm catches them
        (weekly table -> monthly review -> quarterly showcase)

8. Content Capture

Each event is a content and proof factory. The table below identifies at least five content pieces extractable from each event type, with format and responsibility, all subject to clearance. The single discipline that governs all of it: nothing client-specific or partner-named is used publicly without consent, and Pottsville is the only cleared public case (OTR internal only, Hidrive percentages only, Jewell's own named results under Jewell's banner). Where the work is production rather than judgement, Max drafts the words and Pip drafts the social, and a human signs off, which is the model producing its own content.

From the 3 July session (at least five pieces)

Content pieceFormatResponsibilityClearance note
1. The live engine walkthrough (Max, Sal, Pip)Screen recording of the live run, edited into a short reusable proof clipRaef captures, ops editsRun on Maxxim itself, self-owned, freely usable
2. The partner mapThe structured output, anonymised into a community-shape graphicClent and RaefNo named partner used publicly without consent
3. Founder framing on the 80/20 capShort speaker quote and a LinkedIn postClent, ops repurposes (Pip drafts, human approves)Founder voice, freely usable
4. The category and community storyA blog recap of the founding session (no named attendees without consent)Ops, Max drafts, Clent sign-offGeneralised; consent for any names
5. Pottsville as the cleared proof momentRefreshed case reference repurposed from the session useOpsPottsville public, cleared
6. Photography of the table (optional)Candid, real over staged, on-brand imageryOps, with attendee consentConsent required before any face is used

Note: the Jewell live-partner exhibit is powerful in the room but is not repurposed as Maxxim's own public content; Jewell's material stays under Jewell's banner.

From the recurring programme

Responsibility model. Raef owns platform and live-run capture; ops owns editing, repurposing, and the hub library, with Max drafting words and Pip drafting social; Clent owns method authority, sign-off, and any external send (no external send without Clent sign-off). Consent and clearance are checked before any partner or client is named publicly.

9. Lead Capture and Follow Up

Post-event follow-up is where the return is realised. The discipline is fixed: a follow-up within 48 hours, because after 72 hours momentum is lost. For Maxxim, lead capture is partner-recruitment data, and the most important data discipline is the lead-source rule the business plan and marketing plan both require.

Registration and in-event data collection

Lead scoring adjustments based on event engagement

Post-event nurture sequence

Sales handoff criteria

There is no separate sales team near term; the founder is the close. The handoff is from event follow-up into the founding-cohort recruitment (Marketing Plan Campaign 2). An attendee is ready for the cohort conversation when they have named a door preference and a client or vertical they would run it on. The decisive commercial discipline at engagement time is the documented lead-source rule: every future engagement is tagged partner-sourced, Maxxim-sourced, or referred before delivery begins, because that tag drives the clip scaling and the finder's fee. This rule must be a simple written rule in place before the first Maxxim-sourced deal.

CRM and tooling requirements

10. Budget Framework

The events budget is deliberately modest, because the model is proof-led and partner-led, and the highest-leverage events (the founding session and the weekly table) cost facilitation time, not media. Every figure below is illustrative, pending pilots, and requires Clent sign-off. Within the marketing plan budget, events draw chiefly on the 3 July session and founding-event line (around 25 percent of the marketing budget, illustrative) and the partner hub and community-facilitation line (around 20 percent, illustrative); the recurring programme is funded mostly by the community-facilitation line.

Cost categories by event type

EventMain cost categoriesEstimated spend (illustrative)Notes
3 July session Venue or room hire; AV and screen; Wi-Fi; name badges and printed leave-behind; light catering; the live Cowork and Studio environment prep; facilitation time Low, illustrative, pending sign-off The cost is preparation and facilitation, not media. The single highest-leverage spend in the plan.
Weekly open table